Results and Card Feedback

["The New Era Icon" David Calaz]

Will people stop being so on edge lately... whats happened to this place?

This used to be a place where everyone got along, we were gelling so well its just turning into an internet big brotehr without teh evictions...

I vote people all just calm down take a breather and stop arguing.

[Dan "Dragon" Taylor]

I'll argue your mother...? No?

I'll get my coat.

[~*The Pride of Ireland*~]

Thats what i had meant, as an overall scope of how i judge this week, i just ended it off by making sure we dont get you screwed individually either. Just to bury the hatchet in case you may have thought i had a bias against you or your style.

Secondly, i know your new Gavin but Chan has expressed dozens of times that she hates RP limits, and as co-owner, what she says goes.

But just to verify it, Dan did leave me in charge, despite not having any actual admin powers, which is fine. I just want everyone to understand that im doing the best i can to make sure Dan doesnt have an anurism when he gets back. The only other complaint i have about how i have done things is about the tag team match this week for the Number One contendership. But if anyone has anything else to say in how i can do better, you can do so here. despite whats been said, lets make this thread so that i can do better for this weeks results and next card.

[Jordan "Bullet Proof" Glass]

Not only does Chan disagree with them, we had kind of a vote, and the majority was for no limits, I do believe. I, personally, hate them with a freakin' passion. They drive me insane and make me want to not RP at all, and I don't want that.

I agree with Corp, all our roleplays were equal. I just happened to have more, so I won. Mind you, my last post was done 6 minutes before deadline simply because I reallllyyyy wanted to reply to Dan's RP, and I only had 15 minutes to write it, so I rushed my nuts off.

Dan, people always tell you that you should have won. It's their opinion, but maybe Corp's was different. Well .. obviously it was, but y'know what I mean. Next time that it happens, maybe you'll win, maybe not. It really and truly depends on the judge(s) who judge the RP's.

I agree, the description means alot sometimes. I sometimes have more description than dialogue, simply because that's the way I chose to write that roleplay. I'm sure you can find examples of this from almost anyones RP archive.

Really Dan, my philosophy is that if you're not pinned, you didn't lose. Hence, I still have 0 loses. Technically, I've lost 1, maybe 2 matches but in both I wasn't pinned, so I, along with a unnamed person I asked, don't count it as a loss.

James, you should consult the judges anyway, I believe. I know I would. I would rather have two or more people decide on a match than a single person. Opinions vary, like a few people already said. The end of a match could be different because of one single vote. I don't know if that's the way Dan does it, but it's the way I would. I'd ask someone who I know is not bias, or could make themselves view it in a unbiased way.

Yes, James, please do read description.

Guys, Corp is doing the best he can. This was brought upon him when he (guessing at this) has had no experience in running a fed, and I think so far he's doing a damn good job at it. The site is still running, nobody got shot (yet) and we're still RPing .. aren't we? *runs off to check the Side Effect RP board*

[~*The Pride of Ireland*~]

I have little experience running a board. Technically i had a fed called Killer Wrestling Entertainment that lasted...uhm...a week. So by my track record i wasnt the best overall canidate, but XVI is so freakin awesome i just had so many ideas to run by, i guess Dan just trusts me. lol.

[The Modern Outlaw]

ur doing a good job man and I have no problems with my match this week, especially considering my opponents have yet to rp. lol